Thread Closed  Topic Closed
  Second Generation Camaro Owners Group Message Board
  Camaro Questions
  1977 Z28 (Page 6)

Post New Topic  Thread Closed  Topic Closed
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 42 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   1977 Z28
sharon77
Veteran Member
posted October 03, 2003 04:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sharon77     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
OK, shoot me for bad math Madmike says in this site's stats. 14,349 Z28s produced...5,114 got the st-10.

IP Logged

tallman1970@yahoo.com
Veteran Member
posted October 03, 2003 11:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tallman1970@yahoo.com   Click Here to Email tallman1970@yahoo.com     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      View tallman1970@yahoo.com's car!
1977 Z28 is my favorate,There rare orginal one year wonders make them unique like the 1974Z28.The special decals are sweet from factory orginal,Yes I agree 4-speed ones are rare and are going to be $$$ in value if not right now,Any 77Z28 owners auto/stick hold on to them no doubt about it.So the ebay 77 is Orange right?,I didnt know they made a "Copper" in 1977.

IP Logged

aero80
Veteran Member
posted October 04, 2003 03:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for aero80     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit aero80's Homepage!   View aero80's car!
While the chalk and crayon marks of the first gen firewall seem to be missing from the 2nd gen cars, it is a little-known fact that the first of the 77 1/2 cars had specially picked engines that were of better quality than the ordinary production line engine.
These engines were marked with a crayon on the driver's side valve cover. They were marked "28".
I took a picture of mine when it only had about 15 miles on it. The crayon mark clearly shows. I confirmed this with a Chev exec (who ordered the car for me). Even then I felt that someday the car would be special, as all half-year Chevrolets always are.

You may have a copy of the pic simply by asking for it. I'll email it to you.

Also, the pictures of the original IROC cars are now scanned and available. Although they are copyrighted, please feel free to ask for them if you are interested in non-publicity candid pictures of the original Banjo Matthews IROC cars.

------------------
Aero80

IP Logged

sharon77
Veteran Member
posted October 04, 2003 10:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for sharon77     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
The color "light red" that mine has been restored to is has a very orange cast. Unless it it right next to a true hugger orange car, a lot of people will think it orange.

IP Logged

rich m
Veteran Member
posted October 05, 2003 02:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rich m   Click Here to Email rich m     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
Now THAT's what I wanted to hear, stories like Aero's about these "special" Z28 motors, and cars originally painted other than the "seven" factory colors, that and weird factory option info! Anybody got more? How about an original equipment L82 motor (sorry Dirt, that bad-ass motor you put in back then kicks butt, but it wasn't factory installed!)

Aero, please e-mail me those pics at carnut2256@cox.net Can you elaborate more on those special engines? What exactly made them different? How exactly were they picked, and how much stronger were they?

No, I have never seen or heard of any other colors being offered than those seven, but with GM, nothing would surprise me. Remember the all white 1977 Can Am's? I read years later that seven were actually painted a reddish orange (Carousel Red, for you Poncho fans). I do have an ad from a magazine in 1977 for Western Wheels that DOES show a new 1977 Z painted that burnt cinnamon color!!!! Thought it was just a "re-paint" though. Hmmm could it possibly be that same car? Also, find it hard to believe that the ratio of sticks to auto's wasn't at least 50-50 ..... first of all, all the road tests said that the stick car at least FELT faster, plus the 4 speed was standard equipment where the auto was an extra cost option .... besides, this car had a 4 speed attitude behind it anyway!

almost 150 posts to this thread!!!! Let's hear more !!!!

IP Logged

aero80
Veteran Member
posted October 05, 2003 03:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for aero80     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit aero80's Homepage!   View aero80's car!
I had an unfortunate word choice when I wrote the post about the marked engines. I didn't meant to suggest that they were special performance units, but simply that they were designated for use in the Z28 for some reason.
I gave my ideas in the other thread dealing with this issue.
I can say this for certain, though: My 77 lost to a '69 302 car by exactly the front fender length in a "contest". Not bad for a bone-stock LM-1.
I'm not suggesting anything, and that's for sure. It's just a matter of history now.

This thread is of wide interest, and we should always try to be accurate in our descriptions for the sake of those who wish to restore their half-year cars.

I'll mail you the pics of the IROCs tonight.

------------------
Aero80

IP Logged

aero80
Veteran Member
posted October 05, 2003 03:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for aero80     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit aero80's Homepage!   View aero80's car!
ReD-DaWg-OnE,

The IROC cars whose pics I sent were specially constructed Banjo Matthews cars and were no real relation to the production car they resemble.
Those are 2nd gen IROCs, but don't confuse that with the 2nd gen title for Camaros.

The 1st gen IROC Camaros replaced the one-year only Porsches of 1973. They started as real cars, were modified for racing, and then re-modified slightly when the '75 Camaro appeared with the larger back window. These 1st gen cars retained their tubs and inner structure, sub-frames, etc etc.
The 2nd gen IROCs took the rubber nose shape, but were never real cars from the production line. They were more like what you think of when you think NASCAR construction. Some exterior skin, and that's about it.

The pics you now have show the cars being unloaded and prepared for the 1978 Riverside IROC race. Notice that the cars were shipped with metal windows.

------------------
Aero80

IP Logged

Dirt Reynolds
Veteran Member
posted October 05, 2003 04:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dirt Reynolds   Click Here to Email Dirt Reynolds     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
Anybody got more? How about an original equipment L82 motor (sorry Dirt, that bad-ass motor you put in back then kicks butt, but it wasn't factory installed!)

Rich, there is only one problem I can see about a '77 Z with an L82 factory-installed: since the L82 only went into the Corvette back then, Chevrolet would have to have shipped an L-82 engine shipped to either Norwood or Van Nuys special-order, and I just don't see that happening in the era of smogged-down engines and gov't red tape.

On another note, if Chevrolet put a slightly modified 400 small block in the '77 Z, it would have kicked the butts of all other new cars of the time. These engines have truckloads of torque. Can you imagine a 400 with the L-82 cam and 9:1 compression - I ran a Desktop Dyno simulation just for the heck of it. With a 400, 9:1 compression, 1.94/1.50 valves smogger heads, L-82 cam, stock exhaust manifolds/mufflers, I got 243HP @ 4000 RPM, and 361 ft/lbs torque @ 3000 RPM.

Would have made for some legendary street performance for back then I'd say.

------------------
1977 Z/28
12.15 @ 110.52 1.68 60'
413" small-block, Vortec heads, TH400, 4:10's

IP Logged

rich m
Veteran Member
posted October 05, 2003 10:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rich m   Click Here to Email rich m     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
Wow, Dirt! That would have been a real tough combination. Thanks for sharing that desktop test with us! Yes, I'm aware that Chevy would have had to ship a single L82 motor to the assembly plant, but hey, stranger things have happened!
I've read a lot over the years about one of a kind musclecars that had odd options, engines, paint, etc. The bottom line (at least at GM and Chrysler) is that if it was available, and the order had the correct codes for it, these factories would just build it!
Every engine had to be EPA certified in every model it was offered in, and the 350 (LM1) was already certified in the Camaro, and as the L82 was a 350 and already certified in the 1977 Corvette, one could make the assumption that since it was still a 350 (which was certified and would bolt into a Camaro F Body), then if the right codes were entered, Chevy would in fact ship an L82 to that plant for the designated car (wonder if the exhaust manifolds would have been different enough to cause a problem in the Z?).
I've seen crazier things happen! And if a color was available by GM, and had an order code, you could pretty much order say a Corvette color on a Camaro (as long as the stripes and interior were deemed compatible). I've seen this happen with Mopars, where the factory wouldn't allow a specially coded paint job on one model from another one because the interior wouldn't match right.
As long as you gave them a code for an item that was ALREADY available (on any other model) and weren't asking them to do something completely new, chances weren't bad that you'd get it!
By the way, I've got one or two articles from 1977 on those IROC cars. When I get home, I'll find them and try to scan them for everyone.

IP Logged

rich m
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 12:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rich m   Click Here to Email rich m     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
Aero, thanks for the great pics, the '77 Z engine markings as well as the IROC cars! As far as the IROC cars, you said they were taken in 1978, but they seem to have 1979 lower rocker panel stripes, don't they?
As for those chalk marks on your '77 Z's valve cover, I'm wondering if you or anyone else has ever seen a "28" (or any other number) on a valve cover like that anywhere else? Everything I've ever read about chalk marks seems to indicate an arbitrary inspection ( or selection?) by an inspector? I'd love to hear more about what that Chevy guy told you, it's very interesting!
Lastly, I just got home and pulled a couple of magazine back issues on the IROC cars of 1977. I'll read more and post something later.

IP Logged

aero80
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 02:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for aero80     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit aero80's Homepage!   View aero80's car!
Yes, the pictures were taken in Oct 1978.
They had the appearance of the new year model which had come out the previous month. These cars changed appearance easily during the years in which they were used.

I saw another valve cover marked in the same manner as mine.
When I purchased this car I was in the Navy at Great Lakes NTC. The first night of ownership I had duty, so I volunteered for "parking lot patrol" (a bonafide job performed by volunteers to insure security in base parking areas) mainly so that I could look at my new car. I drove to a spot near to where I would make my rounds and there under a light was an identical car to mine in every way except that it carried the normal option list (mine was a zero-option radio-delete car). I parked directly next to it under the light and was having fun looking at them when the owner of the other car came up. He was drunk and just stood there and announced that he must be having double vision. After I straightened him out, we talked about our cars as much as you can with a drunk sailor, and of course we popped the hoods. Up to that point I hadn't paid any attention to the marking on my valve cover, but when I saw a 28 on his it came to mind, and sure enough mine said 28 also. The other swabbie didn't care, but I thought it was kind of neat that a Z28 should say 28 on it.

The man who ordered the car did so because I was going to marry his daughter (which I did), and convinced me that I should get a "real" sports car to replace the TR-5 I was driving. Hey, that was a nice car... basically an SCCA C-production car with Webers and headlights. Anyway, it is best if I keep the lurid details private, but suffice to say that my other wedding present which was aluminum and came on a pallet was wonderful, even though it was used. I didn't care when I saw what it was.
There was an ulterior motive to all this, as I was to find out years later, many years. My mother-in-law told me the story only after my father-in-law had passed away.
I think that at this point I would rather not continue publicly, but since you are so interested in the early history of the re-introduced Z28, I will tell you privately if you email me. I'm keeping a promise.

I was only 23 when all this happened. I was very fortunate. I basically just stumbled into the whole thing when I met a girl and liked her, and at the same time saw an ad for the new Z28 in Gentleman's Quarterly. It was the brown car ad, and I still have the original magazine from then, all saved up, along with everything I could find in those days in print. I saved every one of them.

There is a great pic of an early bumper IROC car used in Goodyear ads in Road & Track magazine, among others. It shows an orange IROC, full side view, two page spread. I have that too. Man, I never throw anything away about early camaros. I bought them all when they were new on the stands.

------------------
Aero80

IP Logged

aero80
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 01:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for aero80     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit aero80's Homepage!   View aero80's car!
It came with a little plastic plate where the radio was supposed to be. It had a bow-tie molded into it. I have a pic showing it somewhere. I'll scan it and send it if you like.
The car had as listed options tinted glass and a side-terminal battery, besides the Z28/F-41 equipment. That was it. Ok, two options, so I guess it was not zero option technically. I've never seen a Z28 without tinted glass, so maybe it was part of the package as a mandatory thing like the F-41 suspension. That's why I said it was a zero-option car. This car had been special-ordered. All of the other Zs that I saw in those days had basically full-boat option lists. Remember, this was the day when everyone wanted to be a combination of Burt Reynolds and John Travolta.
Not me. T-shirt and levis, tool box in the trunk, and the familiar parking spot at the speed shop was more my style. I've never been to a disco, and neiter had my car.

Ever read Cars Magazine? They used to have a great editorial style, definite and to the point. People like Nunzi Romano would take new cars and really work them with basically factory parts, and they would haul ass. That was my attitude towards my new Z and the incredible gift of a ZL-1 engine. I used a Corvette intake (low-rise) and the hood would close ok. I always tried to "Keep your GM car all GM". That magazine out of New York really influenced me as far as how to run my supercar.

Remember, this was the day of the 55 mph limit, which my Z would make in second gear, so getting on the freeway and hitting third would leave the traffic standing still, and fourth would be a rush forward. I used the stock mufflers and tailpipes hooked up to Hooker Super Comps, and they sounded absolutely bitchin. On the fwy they howled like an Indy car, with a very smooth but high pitch. Whenever I would pull alongside some other performance car on the freeway, it would intimidate the driver just by being there and sounding off. It was running the original 12:1 compression, which made it sound great as well. I must have bought gallons of octane boost over the years. Early boost would cram up the combustion chamber a lot.
Recently I tried to replace them on my '80 project, but the replacements, while good (Walker Dyno-maxes) are no way the same thing. Those original cans were not mufflers, they were resonators, and when used alone they sure were nice. Man, if only someone would repro those originals.

I have all the mags stored in the same spot, and easy to get to. As soon as I get some time I'll make a list and post it. The GQ ad showed the brown Z28 driving toward the camera. I remember that when I first saw it I was very excited at the thought of having a V8/four-speed performance Camaro instead of the 225 horsepower TR-5 that I was driving at the time (that car flat hauled ass and would easily take out 911S Porsches). That's how strong the psychology of that ad was. Just the thought of a new Z28 was enough to get me going. The amazing public response to my car was certainly symptomatic of the thirst of the American people for an exciting alternative to the disco crap offered the previous few years.

Since you've apparently read the printed literature (excuse the over-use of that term) of the day, you see that the new Z28 was for the day a fast and good handling car. It deserved the adulation heaped upon it by the public at-large. By the time the '78s came out, this was beginning to disappear, at least in the daily exposure in public. They woke back up for a little while in the spring of '78, though, when at OCIR I laid down smoking 12:1 open-header tracks and demonstrated the superiority of the American Supercar using that poor little Chastain Capri as a canvas to paint the picture on. The R&T people didn't quite know what to do, but the fans did. I pulled up to park with thumbs ups and cheers. The crowd that gathered around my car right next to that Capri made the whole R&T group look foolish. No one was looking at their car. I think that the metallic silver had some part in that... it was a very elegant looking car parked there, not a car for gold-chain disco flappers. Another element of that pass was the fact that the car was so light on its feet, nose-high from the aluminum engine and its torque, and the silver being a weightless looking color itsef.... all these elements taken together made everyone watching feel good about their country. It was an american victory... that's how it was seen, that's how it was taken.

The first 77 1/2 I ever saw was a red one, parked. But the second one was driving by and slowing down, a brown/camel one, and it was just like the mags described... the exhaust was something you hadn't heard in a new car for years.

In the early mornings on the base when I first got the car I would fire up my new Z and drive to the school I was attending there, and as I drove in second gear down the road everyone would turn and stare. After hours, out in the real world, same thing... everyone would turn and stare, pedestrians would stop in crosswalks or call to me from corners, horns would honk, people would be crowded around it when I came out form a store, etc etc. I had absolutely no privacy in that car. When a month later the rubber nose '78s came out, we thought they looked a little funny.
Personally, I think that the black rub strip on the 77 1/2 cars breaks up the nose just enough to make it look better. That horizontal black line makes a big difference, especially on lighter colors like, ahem, code 13.

Back to work now. I'm working on my doctorate and preparing for law school, but I seem to just type away about my silver Camaro. My books and work are just sitting there. Can't help it... I still wear levis and t-shirts.

------------------
Aero80

IP Logged

rich m
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 04:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rich m   Click Here to Email rich m     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
A 225 HP TR5 ???? Are you kidding me??? Jiminey crickets!!!! That must have been flat out SICK to run against!

Yes, CARS was a favorite of mine back in the day, used to read it monthly for the "how to" tech articles. Those guys were pretty sharp! Still have a bunch of back issues from the late '70s.

I too bought my Z solely because of that ad, saw mine in the Army Times, ran right out and cancelled the order for a new Pontiac Can Am, and away I went to order my Z. Yep, those tin cans on the back really made a sweet sound! Thought for sure someone made resto pieces, those F Bodies used them through some very popular years!

I saw an early photo of the '78 car, when I was told that my '77 was scrapped, and didn't like it at all. I thought the '77 bumper job looked much better, yes the rub strip helped break up the color a bit, and I thought the bumper guards would do so even more, so ordered those on my car. Didn't get many options on my car either, that was the hot rodder in me, (posi, AM/FM, tinted glass, rear defrost, console for the 4 speed). Didn't order A/C, which caused me a lot of grief when ordering the car in Houston!). BTW, I would definately consider your car to be "zero option"!

Look forward to hearing about your literature collection. Good luck on the doctorate and Law School (not lettin' a little thing like middle age stop you, way to go!!!!) Nice hearing from all of you!

IP Logged

kenny77
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 09:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kenny77   Click Here to Email kenny77     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote   Visit kenny77's Homepage!   View kenny77's car!
quote:
Originally posted by aero80:
It came with a little plastic plate where the radio was supposed to be. It had a bow-tie molded into it. I have a pic showing it somewhere. I'll scan it and send it if you like.
The car had as listed options tinted glass and a side-terminal battery, besides the Z28/F-41 equipment. That was it. Ok, two options, so I guess it was not zero option technically. I've never seen a Z28 without tinted glass, so maybe it was part of the package as a mandatory thing like the F-41 suspension. That's why I said it was a zero-option car. This car had been special-ordered. All of the other Zs that I saw in those days had basically full-boat option lists. Remember, this was the day when everyone wanted to be a combination of Burt Reynolds and John Travolta.
Not me. T-shirt and levis, tool box in the trunk, and the familiar parking spot at the speed shop was more my style. I've never been to a disco, and neiter had my car.

Ever read Cars Magazine? They used to have a great editorial style, definite and to the point. People like Nunzi Romano would take new cars and really work them with basically factory parts, and they would haul ass. That was my attitude towards my new Z and the incredible gift of a ZL-1 engine. I used a Corvette intake (low-rise) and the hood would close ok. I always tried to "Keep your GM car all GM". That magazine out of New York really influenced me as far as how to run my supercar.

Remember, this was the day of the 55 mph limit, which my Z would make in second gear, so getting on the freeway and hitting third would leave the traffic standing still, and fourth would be a rush forward. I used the stock mufflers and tailpipes hooked up to Hooker Super Comps, and they sounded absolutely bitchin. On the fwy they howled like an Indy car, with a very smooth but high pitch. Whenever I would pull alongside some other performance car on the freeway, it would intimidate the driver just by being there and sounding off. It was running the original 12:1 compression, which made it sound great as well. I must have bought gallons of octane boost over the years. Early boost would cram up the combustion chamber a lot.
Recently I tried to replace them on my '80 project, but the replacements, while good (Walker Dyno-maxes) are no way the same thing. Those original cans were not mufflers, they were resonators, and when used alone they sure were nice. Man, if only someone would repro those originals.

I have all the mags stored in the same spot, and easy to get to. As soon as I get some time I'll make a list and post it. The GQ ad showed the brown Z28 driving toward the camera. I remember that when I first saw it I was very excited at the thought of having a V8/four-speed performance Camaro instead of the 225 horsepower TR-5 that I was driving at the time (that car flat hauled ass and would easily take out 911S Porsches). That's how strong the psychology of that ad was. Just the thought of a new Z28 was enough to get me going. The amazing public response to my car was certainly symptomatic of the thirst of the American people for an exciting alternative to the disco crap offered the previous few years.

Since you've apparently read the printed literature (excuse the over-use of that term) of the day, you see that the new Z28 was for the day a fast and good handling car. It deserved the adulation heaped upon it by the public at-large. By the time the '78s came out, this was beginning to disappear, at least in the daily exposure in public. They woke back up for a little while in the spring of '78, though, when at OCIR I laid down smoking 12:1 open-header tracks and demonstrated the superiority of the American Supercar using that poor little Chastain Capri as a canvas to paint the picture on. The R&T people didn't quite know what to do, but the fans did. I pulled up to park with thumbs ups and cheers. The crowd that gathered around my car right next to that Capri made the whole R&T group look foolish. No one was looking at their car. I think that the metallic silver had some part in that... it was a very elegant looking car parked there, not a car for gold-chain disco flappers. Another element of that pass was the fact that the car was so light on its feet, nose-high from the aluminum engine and its torque, and the silver being a weightless looking color itsef.... all these elements taken together made everyone watching feel good about their country. It was an american victory... that's how it was seen, that's how it was taken.

The first 77 1/2 I ever saw was a red one, parked. But the second one was driving by and slowing down, a brown/camel one, and it was just like the mags described... the exhaust was something you hadn't heard in a new car for years.

In the early mornings on the base when I first got the car I would fire up my new Z and drive to the school I was attending there, and as I drove in second gear down the road everyone would turn and stare. After hours, out in the real world, same thing... everyone would turn and stare, pedestrians would stop in crosswalks or call to me from corners, horns would honk, people would be crowded around it when I came out form a store, etc etc. I had absolutely no privacy in that car. When a month later the rubber nose '78s came out, we thought they looked a little funny.
Personally, I think that the black rub strip on the 77 1/2 cars breaks up the nose just enough to make it look better. That horizontal black line makes a big difference, especially on lighter colors like, ahem, code 13.

Back to work now. I'm working on my doctorate and preparing for law school, but I seem to just type away about my silver Camaro. My books and work are just sitting there. Can't help it... I still wear levis and t-shirts.


Damn.....let me ask you a question....Do you have any money??? Wanna buy mine????

I'm looking right now at another 76 T/A SE, T-tops 400 4 speed. But the guy wants a lot. And my 2 car garage is not big enough for 2 f-bodys>>>>>>>>>>>Ken

And I had a TR-7 in High School. The wedge. The shape of things to come. Remember that stuff?

[This message has been edited by kenny77 (edited October 06, 2003).]

IP Logged

rich m
Veteran Member
posted October 06, 2003 09:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rich m   Click Here to Email rich m     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote      
The wedge, the shape of things to come ..... it WAS the shape of things to come, until Ford came out with the "jellybean" Taurus and Thunderbird! Lots of cars had begun the "wedge" look (X 1/9, Fiero, MR2, 3rd gen F Body, etc.)

IP Logged


This topic is 42 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Open Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Thread Closed  Topic Closed
Hop to:

Contact Us | Second Generation Camaro Owners Group

Copyright © 1997 - 2005 M Squared, Inc.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e