|
09-29-2003, 06:15:00 PM
|
#1
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Phoenix,AZ,U.S.A.
Posts: 22
|
'78 Nose on '77?
I have an '77 Z and want the '78 up nose on it....Do I need new front fenders also? What about the front bumber inner frame? Basically what all do I need to convert to the '78 nose? thanks Blue
|
|
|
09-29-2003, 06:38:00 PM
|
#2
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,990
|
No offence to your plans or anything, but this is my opinion. I'd leave the 77Z alone and find a 78 or up car. That's just me though. If it was a plain jane 77, I'd go ahead and you will need nose, bumpers, inner bumper supports, and fenders.
I haven't seen too many intact 77 Z's, and I for one like the big bumper cars. However, I'm in the minority
What would you do with the back end? Leave the big bumper or put a soft bumper on it?
Good luck
[This message has been edited by Nick76 (edited September 29, 2003).]
|
|
|
09-29-2003, 06:44:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Phoenix,AZ,U.S.A.
Posts: 22
|
Well that would be one option but the car is pretty much a project $200 car, so I want to do the soft front and rear bumbers. And add '70 tail lights for the rear.I know a lot of welding and cutting but I can do that. Blue
|
|
|
09-29-2003, 07:11:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,990
|
doing the rear bumper might be a much bigger challenge than the front. The quarters are different, the rear fascia and tail panel understructure is different. I'm thinking a lot of cutting and welding.
|
|
|
09-29-2003, 08:30:00 PM
|
#5
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Where ever the gov feels like putting me.
Posts: 2,909
|
I'd say forget it.
|
|
|
09-30-2003, 12:33:00 AM
|
#6
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Poplar Bluff, MO USA
Posts: 487
|
Nick76 has the same opinion as me. In 77, there were only a little more than 14,000 Z's made. If you fix it up original, then it'll be worth more and you'll probably have less into it and it'll definately be easier. I would buy it as a 77, but never as a 70/77/78 hybrid.
|
|
|
09-30-2003, 12:54:00 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: union mo. usa
Posts: 80
|
To each his own but i agree with the rest. I would use plane jane for that job.Just sold unrestowed 77z for 11,ooo very nice car but still needed some work to finish. Traded the car for some paintand cash to finish restow on 76LT bone stock 28,817 all origanl except tires shocks wheels.
|
|
|
09-30-2003, 01:21:00 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, 92647
Posts: 1,204
|
mmm, 78 nose 70 tail lights. :9
__________________
When a man lies, he murders a part of the world.
These are the pale deaths in which men miscall their lives.
All this I cannot bear to witness any longer.
Cannot the Kingdom of Salvation take me home?
|
|
|
09-30-2003, 05:01:00 PM
|
#9
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Phoenix,AZ,U.S.A.
Posts: 22
|
OK I have decided to restore this Z. Thanks to all of you. Please read my new post. Thanks Blue
|
|
|
10-03-2003, 07:06:00 PM
|
#10
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Eastern NC, USA
Posts: 25
|
Dude, do the car the way YOU want it. It's a late 2nd gen Camaro.....I don't see you making much money on the sale of a total resto car considering you're starting with a $200 project vehicle. It's your car, your money, and your time.
|
|
|
10-04-2003, 04:46:00 AM
|
#11
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Westiminister Co USA
Posts: 2,244
|
it looks avery out of place with the 78 front on a 77, just not right
------------------
1977 Camaro Sports coupe
350 +.030
flat top pistons
AFR1 195cc alum. heads
Preformer RPM intake
670cfm Street Avneger
Dynomax headers and sidepipes
TH-350 w/ stage II shift kit
stock tourque converter
3.73's with Eaton posi unit
__________________
1977 Camaro Sports coupe
350 +.030
flat top pistons
AFR 195cc alum. heads
Airgap intake
670cfm Street Avneger
Dynomax headers and sidepipes
TH-350
stock tourque converter
3.73's with Eaton posi unit
Need to upgrade:
Torque converter
cam
|
|
|
10-07-2003, 11:42:00 AM
|
#12
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Marana, Az USA
Posts: 394
|
PLEASE don't do that !!!!!
Especially to a Z. Sell the '77 if need be, to get a later model but keep the original stuff together.
------------------
'77 Sport Coupe; 350/330 HO crate; 350 trans; new suspension, interior, etc.
__________________
In a 2010 1LT now. Miss the '77, but LOVE the '010
|
|
|
04-03-2011, 01:19:56 PM
|
#13
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 133
|
I was watching Muscle Car today and they were trimming up a bumper on a mid 70's Buick to clean up the body lines. Popular Hot Rodding did the same thing with a 1976 Camaro and painted the bumpers body color. This mod did seem like a lot of work, but if you were wanting a more more modern street machine look instead of a resto, it seemed to make sense when paired with dechroming and modern big wheeels with short tire walls. But if that is what you are going for, it seemed easier to do the urethane front bumper swap instead as a bolt on. I was thinking of my 2nd 1976 Camaro I bought back in 1986, which was had a pretty molested front end. The bumper, headlights, and hood were the only parts that were not damaged. Both fenders were rusted out and one had a strange dent in it (you could almost sit in it like a seat). The front upper valance was cracked and grille broken. The lower valance had been torn up good on cement parking barriers. Ultimately I ended up fixing all that, but it was a lot of bodywork. At the time I had come across a rear ended urethane Camaro in a salvage yard, while I was looking for a rear spoiler. It would have been a perfect match for swapping front clips, but it never occurred to me then. Chevy was going to introduced the urethane bumper on the 1976, but design problems moved the intro back. I'm not sure if that would have included a urethane rear bumper too. But swapping the light front bumper onto a big bumper car makes sense from a weight aspect. Putting a lighter bumper on front while retaining the heavier bumper on the rear retains the weight where you want it on the rear axle, while trimming weight off where you don't want it on the front. The Firebird had sported the rear chrome bumper and urethane front bumper look until the mid '70s, so the look isn't unprecedented. I suppose to modernize the look, the rear bumper would be painted body color (maybe the rub strip too, or removed, but there is the recess for it underneath), and maybe tuck it a bit too. But if the anodized or polished aluminum look were kept, the front bezels should be the chrome versions to balance the shiny, maybe retain the gray grille too.
|
|
|
| Messages from Our Sponsors ! |
|
|
|
Awesome NastyZ28.com Merchandise !!
T-shirts, wearing apparel
Drinkware, Mouse Pads, Decals
|
|
04-03-2011, 02:19:56 PM
|
#14
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Summerside, PE, Canada
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Caterpillar
OK I have decided to restore this Z. Thanks to all of you. Please read my new post. Thanks Blue
|
You have made the right choice. 
__________________
1978 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1999 Mazda Protege SE
|
|
|
04-03-2011, 05:06:48 PM
|
#15
|
|
L. G. M. / Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bloomtown, MN
Posts: 21,410
|
I wonder how Caterpillar's 77Z restoration is coming along?
I'm expecting an update any day now.......
Lifeguard.. You gave this one the breath of life after almost eight years! 
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|