NastyZ28 Forum



Go Back   NastyZ28.com > Drivetrain & Performance > Engine Topic
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2008, 09:56:50 PM   #1
Tpx
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 237
EFI vs Carb'd

If you build an engine with EFI and then you build that exact same engine with a carb instead, what are the differences? In mpg, hp, tq, and all other catagories?
__________________
1973 type RS (rebuilding + restomodificating )

1978 type LT (Black)
Tpx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 10:02:43 PM   #2
craigblock
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 683
It's impossible to say.

Assuming a good tune, the EFI engine will be better in all respects, especially emissions and driveability.

Good carbs may be able to approach EFI driveability, but not in all parts of the world. EFI can maintain the correct mixture at the top of a mountain, or at the bottom. That is something that carbs _can't_ do.
craigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 10:11:51 PM   #3
pdq67
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbia, MO, USA
Posts: 10,498
And it's been proven several times that a carbed engine will produce as much, if not a schosh more power up TOP as an EFI will, except that you have to really work w/ a carb to get it to run as good as an EFI in the lower and mid range rpm's! It can be done but it's a hassle and you will really need to know how to tune the carb. to do it!

But a carb is a BUNCH cheaper than an EFI!!

pdq67
pdq67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 10:15:44 PM   #4
Gary S
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bismarck, North Dakota
Posts: 16,494
For Emissions, EFI is best.
For mileage, they are probably equal.
For horsepower, probably again equal.
For driveability, I've never driven any EFI engine that is as smooth and responsive as a properly set up carb. No computer means no computer controlled spasms.
Gary S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 11:39:27 AM   #5
ULTM8Z
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary S
For Emissions, EFI is best.
For mileage, they are probably equal.
For horsepower, probably again equal.
For driveability, I've never driven any EFI engine that is as smooth and responsive as a properly set up carb. No computer means no computer controlled spasms.

I disagree on fuel mileage. I picked up 3-4 mpg in the city and 2 on the highway (highway mileage was already great due to the overdrive trans). Not amazing increases by any means, but you do get some increase. If one is going for EFI just for mileage, it's not worth the initial cash outlay (unless you're able to do it extremely cheaply).

Also, for tune-ability, the EFI has the advantage. The amount of fidelity I have on fuel and spark control is lightyears ahead of a carbed engine- and that's using EFI technology that's almost 20 years old now.
ULTM8Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 12:16:09 PM   #6
Lowend
Administrator
 
Lowend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 12,061
The "common knowledge" about carbs making more power was true 10 years ago, its not true anymore. The ability of the ECM to react and the engineering is at a much higher level now. Think about the PC you have now vs 10 years ago.
Sorry folks a good properly tuned EFI wins in every category.
__________________
“Realists do not fear the results of their study.”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  • This makes sense. I'm agreeing with Lowend,. - Shawn 1/27/2011
  • Lowend sit down for a minute because I'm going to agree with you on this point - Knuckle Dragger 12/14/2012
  • I (gulp) very much agree with this - 69LM1 1/12/2013

Come make a difference at Kiva!
Lowend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 01:37:18 PM   #7
Tpx
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 237
Now I just need $2,000 .. I'll just buy a good $400 carb until I can convert over to E-85 and EFI :/
__________________
1973 type RS (rebuilding + restomodificating )

1978 type LT (Black)
Tpx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 02:00:09 PM   #8
ejpii
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 246
I have an old analog Pro-Jection 4 now but I have been looking into these two systems. I like the fuel injection. It also helped me pass the emission test in closed loop. My 383 actually ran cleaner than my wives Oldsmobile Bravada.

EJ


http://www.retrotekspeed.com/index.php

http://www.mass-floefi.com/
ejpii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 08:26:40 PM   #9
ULTM8Z
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejpii
I have an old analog Pro-Jection 4 now but I have been looking into these two systems. I like the fuel injection. It also helped me pass the emission test in closed loop. My 383 actually ran cleaner than my wives Oldsmobile Bravada.

EJ


http://www.retrotekspeed.com/index.php

http://www.mass-floefi.com/

Funny how that works isn't it. Your car would be illegal in Looneyfornia....
ULTM8Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Messages from Our Sponsors !
Awesome NastyZ28.com Merchandise !!

T-shirts, wearing apparel

Drinkware, Mouse Pads, Decals

Old 04-25-2008, 08:50:14 PM   #10
Tpx
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTM8Z
Funny how that works isn't it. Your car would be illegal in Looneyfornia....

Since I live in "looneyfornia" I made sure to get a pre '76 car
__________________
1973 type RS (rebuilding + restomodificating )

1978 type LT (Black)
Tpx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 11:02:21 AM   #11
Doug Jaynes
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,578
EFI gives you far more control of your engine. The ability to control the ignition timing is a huge benefit you get with efi. I have nothing against carbs but Ill take efi every time, givin a choice. Driveability is all dependent on the tuner, and that goes for carb or efi systems. With the right tune up, the efi should be better. very few guys are actually really good at tuning, but lots think they are. Im a caveman on the tuneups, but I got friends heh.

Doug
Doug Jaynes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 12:42:53 PM   #12
AJ_72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chebanse, IL USA
Posts: 4,818
Well, keep in mind that computer controlled ignition timing is different than EFI. You don't have to have both. Either will work fine by itself and can be installed either way.

The LS- intake manifold from Edelbrock is a perfect example.
__________________
->Click Here<- for an exhaust clip of my car.
AJ_72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 03:49:34 PM   #13
Doug Jaynes
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,578
"Well, keep in mind that computer controlled ignition timing is different than EFI. You don't have to have both."

very true. but usually if you run a carb, most folks will run a conventional ignition system. where as with an aftermarket efi system it is likely to be computer controlled fuel and ign. But there are some very trick ignition box's available these days I absolutely agree with you.
Doug Jaynes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Copyright © 1997 - 2012 NastyZ28.com Inc.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.