Chuck78
09-17-2004, 11:41:00 PM
I was thinking about buying a choice 3951509 010 020 virgin block for $500, but then I decided to get some calipers and check out the two blocks that I have already, since they both have a minor amount of coreshift.
One has freeze plugs in it, so I could only get the bow calipers through the large deck coolant holes to guage it.
The 3951511 4 bolt is a fresh 4.155" (030) bore, and measures .232"-.255" (some front to rear coreshift).
The 330817 2 bolt has has a ridge at the top of cylinder #3, all other cylinders measure pretty good. Probably needs to go .020 or .030 over. This one, virgin bore, measures .252-.325" (has more coreshift, and side to side vs the other one ft to rr, but thicker walls). So after boring, the thinnest will be .222" or so.
This isn't taking into account one factor. Due to the 400 being such a large small block bore, where the head bolt holes are in the deck, you can feel inside the freeze plug holes where the cylinder walls were cut into where the holes for the head bolts were drilled. I assume they are all this way, as the bores vs head bolt location are not changeable in coreshift. These areas on the block w/o freeze plugs measured around .167" or so.
Since they are a siamese block, does that make the cylinders more rigid, since they are all connected???
On Camaros.net, a few people thought that the minumum bore you can safely run in a siamese block is around .135". Taking these thinner areas into account, I'll be just above that mark. I figured the minumum wall thickness would be a lot higher, thought maybe around .175" would be the limit, but then again, I've never really dealt with this before. I didn'd even know what coreshift was when I got these blocks.
Now... which block should I run? How much power can I run through these? I'll be topped out by around 5700rpm, with peak hp at 5100rpm. Probably 440hp+, and maybe 495 ft-lbs? Mostly street driving, some SCCA racing. No drag racing plans. I have heard the 330817 blocks are not as good supposedly (just opinions, no facts), more prone to coreshift. I saw one guy say he thought the alloy was a lot softer. The 4 bolt 3951511 blocks are a bad 4 bolt design (non-splayed outer bolts put stress in the wrong areas), and are known to crack more readily at high rpm use in the webbing between the cylinders. Not sure which block would be better to run... Instinct tells me the 330817, thicker walls, 2 bolt, but then again, that's a 77 block, the 3951511 is a 71 I think, so it's most likely a better alloy misture.
Not sure if I should get the 509... I figure 10 years from now I may be kicking myself, rather than having a killer block in my car and two extras on the shelf, when everyone else is stuck with 383's, big bucks for a 400 sbc original block or aftermarket block, etc... I also have two spare Super T-10's with nodular cases... Just a little precautious, I guess!
------------------
'71 RS/SS project: fastburn rollercam 406sbc / 9.75:1 / 750 Competition AFB / big 4 whl discs, 1-7/16 VSE ft & 1" Rancho adj. rr sway bars / 4 speed 3.23 posi / 81 Z28 & dual snorkel vette Air Induction
One has freeze plugs in it, so I could only get the bow calipers through the large deck coolant holes to guage it.
The 3951511 4 bolt is a fresh 4.155" (030) bore, and measures .232"-.255" (some front to rear coreshift).
The 330817 2 bolt has has a ridge at the top of cylinder #3, all other cylinders measure pretty good. Probably needs to go .020 or .030 over. This one, virgin bore, measures .252-.325" (has more coreshift, and side to side vs the other one ft to rr, but thicker walls). So after boring, the thinnest will be .222" or so.
This isn't taking into account one factor. Due to the 400 being such a large small block bore, where the head bolt holes are in the deck, you can feel inside the freeze plug holes where the cylinder walls were cut into where the holes for the head bolts were drilled. I assume they are all this way, as the bores vs head bolt location are not changeable in coreshift. These areas on the block w/o freeze plugs measured around .167" or so.
Since they are a siamese block, does that make the cylinders more rigid, since they are all connected???
On Camaros.net, a few people thought that the minumum bore you can safely run in a siamese block is around .135". Taking these thinner areas into account, I'll be just above that mark. I figured the minumum wall thickness would be a lot higher, thought maybe around .175" would be the limit, but then again, I've never really dealt with this before. I didn'd even know what coreshift was when I got these blocks.
Now... which block should I run? How much power can I run through these? I'll be topped out by around 5700rpm, with peak hp at 5100rpm. Probably 440hp+, and maybe 495 ft-lbs? Mostly street driving, some SCCA racing. No drag racing plans. I have heard the 330817 blocks are not as good supposedly (just opinions, no facts), more prone to coreshift. I saw one guy say he thought the alloy was a lot softer. The 4 bolt 3951511 blocks are a bad 4 bolt design (non-splayed outer bolts put stress in the wrong areas), and are known to crack more readily at high rpm use in the webbing between the cylinders. Not sure which block would be better to run... Instinct tells me the 330817, thicker walls, 2 bolt, but then again, that's a 77 block, the 3951511 is a 71 I think, so it's most likely a better alloy misture.
Not sure if I should get the 509... I figure 10 years from now I may be kicking myself, rather than having a killer block in my car and two extras on the shelf, when everyone else is stuck with 383's, big bucks for a 400 sbc original block or aftermarket block, etc... I also have two spare Super T-10's with nodular cases... Just a little precautious, I guess!
------------------
'71 RS/SS project: fastburn rollercam 406sbc / 9.75:1 / 750 Competition AFB / big 4 whl discs, 1-7/16 VSE ft & 1" Rancho adj. rr sway bars / 4 speed 3.23 posi / 81 Z28 & dual snorkel vette Air Induction