View Full Version : Big block "peanut port" and oval port the same?


CA72RS
01-01-2005, 11:36:00 PM
Are big block "peanut port" heads and oval port heads the same? Are all oval port heads the same?

jakeshoe
01-02-2005, 12:26:00 AM
No they are not the same.

Peanut port refers to the very small "round" ports used on late 70-mid 90's motors.

They are great for their intended usage, and can actually work well on a mild street BBC.

This photo shows the difference in a peanut port vs. an oval gasket.

http://jupiter.walagata.com/w/jakeshoe/Stockport.jpg

This is an oval head:
http://jupiter.walagata.com/w/jakeshoe/New390.JPG

jakeshoe
01-02-2005, 12:35:00 AM
Ovals again:
http://jupiter.walagata.com/w/jakeshoe/390intakes.JPG

Rectangular ports:
http://jupiter.walagata.com/w/jakeshoe/L71Heads.JPG

Note the closed chambers of the rectangular port heads...

jakeshoe
01-02-2005, 12:43:00 AM
Semi-closed chambers:
http://upload.79camaro.com/uploads/2004/bbcsc.JPG

Open chambers:
http://upload.79camaro.com/uploads/2004/open%20chamber.JPG

BBC Vortecs:
http://upload.79camaro.com/uploads/2004/bbcvor.JPG

CA72RS
01-02-2005, 02:43:00 PM
Thanks for the great info. I'm pretty sure I have peanut port heads. Now I'm concerned if I get an Edelbrock intake for oval ports, the peanut ports will be smaller than the intake's ports, leaving a 'step' which will cause restriction.

Maybe I should just run the matching quad jet manifold until I upgrade the heads.

badazz81z28
01-03-2005, 03:15:00 AM
<font face="Arial,Verdana" size="2">Originally posted by CA72RS:
Thanks for the great info. I'm pretty sure I have peanut port heads. Now I'm concerned if I get an Edelbrock intake for oval ports, the peanut ports will be smaller than the intake's ports, leaving a 'step' which will cause restriction.

Maybe I should just run the matching quad jet manifold until I upgrade the heads. </font>
Someone go ahead and correct me if Im wrong. Leaving the stock manifold on/unmatched ports on a edelbrock. I dont think there would be much a differnce in comparison.
I would think a edelbrock unmatched would be better than a stocker match cast iron intake. what you all think?

jakeshoe
01-03-2005, 12:02:00 PM
The mismatch is not a problem. The "step" is not detrimental to performance.

The larger plenum and runner volume of the oval intake will better feed the motor.

pdq67
01-03-2005, 09:31:00 PM
Imho, the easiest way to tell to me is if they are wider then they are tall they are PP heads!

And if they are taller then they are wide, then they are large ovals!

And everybody know's how big and rectangular, rect's are...

And I'm not even going ta get inta the "ROVAL" deal that's like a 2/3rds tall, rect port...

pdq67